Blog: The Politics of Hope

Report from the Presbyterian General Assembly – Part 1

Email This Post Email This Post

Something Wonderful Happened

I’ve just returned from Minneapolis, having attended the 219th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church USA at the invitation of the denomination’s Israel Palestine Mission Network. The PC(USA) is at the epicenter of the struggle of the Christian community in the U.S. to come to terms with the challenge of the Israel-Palestine conflict.

A victory had already been achieved before the start of the Assembly.  Overtures from presbyteries from around the country urging action on justice for Palestinians would amount to over 40% of the actions considered by the Assembly. These included revisiting the 2004 decision to undertake phased divestment from companies implicated in the illegal occupation of Palestinian land and an overture affirming that Israel’s actions meet the United Nations definition for the crime of Apartheid. A centerpiece of Presbyterian actions was the call to approve the report of the Middle East Study Committee. The MESC, commissioned by the 2008 General Assembly, had produced a 170 page report entitled “Breaking Down the Walls.”  The report documents the committee’s first-hand observation of the Israeli occupation’s impact on Palestinian society and includes specific recommendations, including urging the U.S. government to make military aid to Israel contingent on ending the occupation.

Predictably, the forces of opposition had gathered. As early as February of this year, the Simon Wiesenthal Center attacked the report, calling it a “poisonous document by the Presbyterian Church [that] will be nothing short of a declaration of war on Israel.” This broadside by the Los Angeles-based Jewish advocacy group went on to declare that the report “shakes the foundations of interfaith relations.” This is the tack that has been taken for years by the mainstream Jewish community – both secular organizations like Wiesenthal as well as the religious denominations — claiming that any questions about Israel’s policies or the Zionist project itself partakes of anti-Semitism. The charge of anti-Semitism and the prospect of a disruption in the “interfaith partnership” has been effective in stifling the discourse and in thwarting actions directed at Israel’s policies. Implicit and sometime explicit in these statements is the threat that such “unfriendly” behavior by Christians will result in the removal of Jewish friendship. This strategy has intensified in recent years in response to efforts by church denominations to take a principled stand on the Israel-Palestine issue. Most recently, the biweekly Christian Century published an article by Ted Smith and Amy-Jill Levine, professors at Vanderbilt Seminary. Appearing the week preceding the PC(USA) General Assembly, the article, entitled “Habits of Anti-Judaism” strongly critiqued the MESC report. In the opening to a letter to the Christian Century I wrote the following:

“The intent of the Presbyterian Middle East Study Committee Report “Breaking Down the Walls” is clear: “to break down these walls that stand in the way of the realization of God’s peaceful and just kingdom.” But in their critique of the report published in your June 29 issue, Ted Smith and Amy-Jill Levine of Vanderbilt Seminary strike at the heart of this message. They ask us to believe that the report advocates “a historical narrative that points indirectly to a single state—a new social body—in which a Palestinian majority displaces Jews.”  In a shocking distortion of the Study Group’s evocation of Ephesians 2:14, they claim that “’Breaking down the walls’ in order to form ‘one new humanity in the place of two’ evokes old echoes of theological supersessionism and transposes them into a political key.” “Old habits die hard,” lament Smith and Levine. But it is the habit of crying anti-Semitism whenever Jewish sensibilities are disturbed or the actions of the State of Israel are questioned that we must urgently confront.”  (Full text of the letter.)

The aim of the article was clear – to strengthen the hand of those who wanted to prevent passage of the report. And why not? This is a time-honored approach — it has always worked. I feared that it would prove just as effective in this case. I arrived in Minneapolis convinced that, except for the efforts of a courageous but small and embattled minority within the denomination, the natural commitment to social justice and support for the oppressed on the part of most Presbyterians would again be trumped by concern for preserving the relationship with the Jewish community. I was betting that the tactics of the Wiesenthal Center and the arguments of Smith and Levine would serve, as they always have, to muzzle the conversation and block actions that might offend Jewish sensibilities or be perceived as hostile to the Jewish state.

A thing of beauty

I was wrong. Yes, the concerns about the feelings of Jews when Israel is “attacked” are still there, and they exert a powerful pull on Presbyterians’ decisions. But something wonderful happened last week in Minneapolis.

I watched as the committee charged with studying “Breaking Down the Walls,” and recommending action to the GA debated the matter. I listened to the arguments for and against approval of the report. Those in favor passionately talked about the suffering of the Palestinians under occupation. Those against spoke just as passionately about the report’s seeming “anti-Israel” bias, claiming that to approve the report would be to cut off dialogue with the Jewish community. I noted what seemed like a universe of disagreement between the two positions. I despaired that anyone who, unlike the study group itself, had not seen the occupation with his or her own eyes would understand that the report was not biased – that it was simply telling the truth and recommending that the church respond accordingly.

But something happened. The committee clearly wanted to find a way to have the report adopted. A group from the committee stayed up all night to craft a number of changes. Problems with perceived bias against Israel were fixed. The obligatory language about Israel’s right to exist was inserted.  None of these changes touched the faithful witness and prophetic heart of the report. While strongly asserting the church’s commitment to Israel’s security and wellbeing, the Study Committee’s report as presented to the General Assembly clearly presents the narrative of Palestinian dispossession and suffering.  It asserts that Israel’s actions, illegal and in violation of international law, are an “enduring threat to peace in the region.” It receives the Palestinian Kairos document, a courageous and heartfelt call of Palestinian Christians “from the heart of Palestinian suffering” to the churches of the world, and recommends it for study by Presbyterians. It calls on the U.S. government to end aid to Israel unless the country stops settlement expansion in Palestinian territories.

The report came before the 730+ commissioners on Friday July 9 and was approved by a vote of 82%. When the results were displayed on the screen, the assembled broke into applause – which is against the rules but in this case the moderator, smiling, allowed the spontaneous outburst to go on! The applause, breaking through these restraints, meant one thing:  this is where the denomination wants to go. Then something else unusual happened – the Moderator, Cindy Bolbach, offered a prayer, thanking God for guiding the assembled to this act, for breaking down the walls dividing people and standing in the way of peace.  The thousands of people in the hall bowed their heads in reverence.  They knew that something important had happened.

It is not always clear from down on the floor, in the thick of things. But looking back, I see that the PC(USA) General Assembly is a thing of beauty. This church is committed to tearing down walls. Watching the plenary, one witnessed a courageous and heartfelt struggle with things that matter:  gay and lesbian ordination and honoring of marriages;  benefits for civil union partners;  how to respond to state laws that violate the rights of immigrants. With respect to the Israel-Palestine question, the struggle will continue. Other overtures did not fare as well as the MESC report. Even though overtures to divest denomination pension funds — close to 10 million dollars — from Caterpillar (the company manufactures the bulldozers that destroy Palestinian homes and build the separation wall) have been proposed at every General Assembly since 2004 (actually it passed in 2004 and then withdrawn in the face of a juggernaut of institutional Jewish pressure, but that’s another story), the overture failed. In addition, Presbyterians could  not bring themselves to approve the overture naming Israel’s policies as Apartheid.

But here is the thing: it is clear to me that all but a small minority of the 36 who voted against that overture in committee (the vote was 16-36) agree that Israel’s actions meet the UN definition of the crime of Apartheid. What drove the vote was not the substance of the overture but rather the belief, as stated in a comment on the vote inserted by the committee, “that dialogue is hampered by words like ‘apartheid.’” It was also clear to me in listening to the debate that, despite the stubborn unwillingness to move to divestment, all but a fringe within the denomination agree that Caterpillar is building machines that illegally and criminally destroy Palestinian life and that the denomination must pressure the company to stop (the Assembly did pass an overture that “denounces” the corporation). The issues are not in question. What is in question for a steadily decreasing percentage — again, this is clear if you are paying attention — is the proper method for action.

To the Presbyterians:  learning to love us

Sixty five years ago, Christians, confronted with the horror of the Nazi genocide, began a painful, faithful process of reconciling with the Jewish people. Presbyterians today didn’t choose to be in the difficult position of having to choose between their commitment to justice and preserving their hard-won friendship with the Jews. But the hard fact is that there has been no getting around this conflict. It has come about because of the policies of the State of Israel and the choice, so far, of the American Jewish establishment to adopt a bullying, defensive stance in response to Christian efforts to address the injustice. Under these challenging conditions, you have had to struggle to learn how to love us well and rightly. And that you are doing. The more you call us to account for our sins and challenge us to be true to the values of our tradition, the more you show your commitment to our friendship. The spirit and the specifics of the MESC report are fully in line with Jewish aspirations and beliefs. More than that – in its powerful plea to break down the walls, it takes my people where we urgently need to go today – to tear down the walls – both psychological and physical – that we have erected between ourselves and the people with whom we share a land and a common history. For thousands of years, our survival as Jews depended on building walls.  Now it depends on tearing them down.

In commissioning and producing this precious and faithful document of “Breaking Down the Walls” you have demonstrated your love for us.  It is love in the deepest, truest sense – love as Jesus and Paul teach us to love – love the way Amos and Hosea, Isaiah and Jeremiah taught us when they spoke truth to power and reminded us of our responsibility to our fellow creatures and to the earth itself.  In going back into the fray, year after year, to consider divestment from the companies that are participating in our sin, and to call us to account for building an apartheid state in full view of the world, you are loving us well. This year, the arguments marshaled against these faithful actions of the denomination, calling them biased and unbalanced, claiming that they will disrupt your “partnership” with us, simply sounded tired.

Minneapolis is the beginning of the end of all that.

Coming:   General Assembly, Part 2 – The Jewish response.


  1. Jack Prince said,

    July 12, 2010 @ 10:34 am

    Thanks, Mark. Some are saying that the PCUSA “waffled”. I did not think so and you back that opinion up. As always, the truth needs to get out through all the smoke and noise.


  2. Susanne Hoder said,

    July 12, 2010 @ 10:44 am

    Thanks, Mark, for your clear explanation and your eloquent defense of people who are really seeking liberty and justice for all. As we celebrate our own freedom this month, it’s encouraging to see Presbyterians and many people of other faiths pursuing this goal. Within a few days we will have an updated listing of Global Actions to End the Occupation (almost 70 pages!) posted at

  3. Kathy Matsushima said,

    July 12, 2010 @ 10:50 am

    So very well said, Mark, and so good to share this journey with you. The Presbyterians are honored to have you sit with us, talk with us, pray with us, and speak for us in this beautiful way. We now share a journey of change and hope with all our Palestinian and Jewish partners.

  4. Hassan Fouda said,

    July 12, 2010 @ 12:22 pm

    Thank you Mark for your contributions and report and thanks to the Presbyterians for their moral courage.

  5. Carolyn Harris said,

    July 12, 2010 @ 12:28 pm

    Dear Mark:

    Thank you for this wonderful analysis of GA. I am really pleased at the 82% vote of the Asembly as I had already left before the vote on Friday. It was so good to have you with us at GA. I’m glad you included your letter to the Christian Century in the blog as it is an excellent response.

    Carolyn Harris

  6. eileen fleming said,

    July 12, 2010 @ 12:28 pm

    Thank you Mark for reporting the Good News, for only if we truly love our friends, will we call them on their bad behavior. As William Blake, wrote:”Opposition is true friendship.”

    PS: I have been recommending “FATAL EMBRACE” to every Christian I know; and everyone on my shopping list for gifts-receives a copy.

  7. Noushin Framke said,

    July 12, 2010 @ 1:07 pm

    Well, i was dreading what would come out of the General Assembly but i am pretty proud to be a Presbyterian right about now!

  8. Cotton Fite said,

    July 12, 2010 @ 2:35 pm

    Bravo to the many who labored so hard to see this report approved! There is a lovely quotation from a Seamus Heaney’s poem at the introduction to Jim Kenney’s book, Thriving in the Crosscurrent:

    History says, Don’t hope
    on this side of the grave,
    But then once in a lifetime
    the longed for tidal wave
    of justice can rise up
    and hope and history rhyme.

    So many courageous people are part of a wave that has never felt tidal to me … but maybe the momentum is gathering.

  9. Amir Obeid said,

    July 12, 2010 @ 6:05 pm

    As an American-Muslim, I have seen little from “Christian” organizations towards the cause of helping the great injustices being committed by the Israelis against the Palestinians. I am glad to see that there are many who are as devoted to fighting injustice as many Muslims in this country are.

    Most Muslims have been living peacefully in this country for a long time but have not taken many inter-faith steps until recently. I pray that God will allow us to see the great similarities between our religions and how we can work together for a peaceful future rather than the differences. I know that almost all Muslims here would equally fight injustices committed by Arabs and supposed “Muslims” against other people and religions and are all opposed to terrorism and the extremist communities in many foreign countries that masquerade themselves as Muslims when in fact they do not adhere to the true religion of Islam at all.

    We should all support equality and fight injustice and racism wherever we see it, for God has created us all different and yet all equal so that the world may be a more diverse and beautiful place, not so that it would be a more hate-filled place. I hope to see more and more people coming together for peace and fighting injustice world-wide. Thank you.

  10. Toni Mann said,

    July 12, 2010 @ 7:45 pm

    Mark — It is really interesting to see these events through your eyes. Thanks for providing a perspective to which many of us do not have access most of the time.

  11. Pauline Coffman said,

    July 12, 2010 @ 8:44 pm

    Mark, I want you to know I read your blog out loud to Rob today at an A&W in Osseo, Wisconsin, and by the time I got to your last paragraph about Jesus and Paul and then Amos, Hosea, Isaiah and Jeremiah, I got all choked up and couldn’t continue. You are generous in your praise. It feels wonderful to bring together that line of prophets along with the present day “truth-tellers” among us, such as yourself. Thanks so much.

  12. Dottie Villesvik said,

    July 13, 2010 @ 12:26 pm

    Thank you Mark. Your remarks were encouraging to me as a commisioner. There were moments that I felt we were being held hostage by the strong “Pro-Israel” camp in the threats we were receiving. I’m so thankful that the majority of the commissiones were able to stand up to the threats. Thank you again!

  13. Bill Plitt said,

    July 13, 2010 @ 12:59 pm


    You captured my sentiments completely. The actions of the General Assembly, which we witnessed together, provide a new dawn not only in our relationships with our Jewish brothers and sisters, but also in the hopefulness expressed through the actions of Palestinians and Israelis aligned together in such projects as The Tent of Nations. Our lives have been changed forever. To use the the word of our brother Daoud, “Wonderful!”. Peace and justice this day, Bill

  14. Jeffrey DeYoe said,

    July 13, 2010 @ 2:36 pm

    Great stuff here and good appraisal of the entire G.A. process. It was great rooming with you and working shoulder-to-shoulder with you for a Just Peace in Palestine.

  15. Don Wagner said,

    July 13, 2010 @ 2:50 pm

    Mark: Not only were you a significant resource person at the General Assembly but your theological acumen and political analysis have been essential in keeping us in line with the Hebrew Prophets and the message of Jesus. The power of those who would prefer to mute and manipulate the questions of justice and peace in Israel-Palestine are slowly being unmasked, as the Assembly’s decisions make clear for “whose who have eyes to see and ears to hear.” We need you and more Jewish partners like you for the long journey ahead. Thanks for being there. Don Wagner

  16. Jim McGown said,

    July 13, 2010 @ 5:58 pm

    Dear Mark, Let me join the chorus of praise for your remarks. I had really wished for divestment from Caterpillar and the apartheid label to be approved, but your analysis makes me realize that progress was made and hope re-kindled. The theology contained in the Kairos Document is, I think, extremely well expressed and important.

  17. eileen fleming said,

    July 14, 2010 @ 8:05 am

    Opportunity to preach beyond the choir is offered at HuffPost, and although I am one lone voice in this wilderness, there are over 2,000 comments thus far RE:
    “Presbyterians: End U.S.-Israel Aid Over Settlements In Palestinian Land”
    All you need is an email address to further the conversation.

  18. Brenda Bentz said,

    July 14, 2010 @ 3:32 pm

    This made me cry. This long effort to learn to love each other.

    And I can picture Don Wagner’s description of your role at the conference. Thank you for that. And thank you for helping the rest of us be there with your reports.


  19. Casey Currie said,

    July 14, 2010 @ 7:56 pm

    I, like Pauline was totally choked up reading the last paragraphs. Thank you so much for your book, and your wonderful work at the GA. I so wish I could have been there with everybody again this year. After the disappointment of 2006 and 2008, it’d have been a welcome incentive to keep up the work. Everybody else here from IPMN, a delight to read your comments here and on Fb. Almost feel I was there.


  20. William Gepford said,

    July 14, 2010 @ 9:40 pm

    Thank you Mark Braverman, for your honesty, for your love, for your willingness to join with us to root out the common evil that seeks to destroy us all, the evil of separation. The politics of separation never resolved anything, It only makes it worse, by pretending that there is a “right side” and a “wrong side”, a winner and a loser. Unless we all win together, we are all losers. As a Presbyterian minister, I have been waiting to hear some one like you for the past 57 years. My hope has been profoundly rekindled.

    Bill Gepford

  21. Herman C. Waetjen said,

    July 15, 2010 @ 3:53 pm

    Dear Mark,

    I deeply appreciate your careful evaluation of the work of General Assembly 2010! It is more hopeful than some of the other reports I have read. But most of all, I am thankful for you! Deeply thankful that you were there and for the witness that you represented and communicated. May we Presbyterians be a divinely directed toward the actualization of justice and peace as you are. You continue to inspire us. Great blessings on you and your ministry of reconciliation and justice!

  22. Walt Davis said,

    July 15, 2010 @ 6:48 pm

    As always, Mark, you see the big picture and show how the specifics contribute to it. Contributions by you and others like you made all the difference!

  23. NETANYAHU STRIPPED NAKED « Desertpeace said,

    July 17, 2010 @ 12:45 pm

    […] Mark Barverman: Something wonderful happened… […]

  24. Netanyahu exposed and more - Blog Post said,

    July 17, 2010 @ 4:06 pm

    […] Children confront soldiers in Nabi Saleh […]

  25. Report from the Presbyterian General Assembly – Part 2, The Jewish Response | Mark Braverman said,

    July 20, 2010 @ 11:25 am

    […] Assembly, the gloves had come off – in addition to the Christian Century article I described in Part 1 of this posting, the Middle East Study Committee report and other overtures had been subject to a barrage of […]

  26. Arthur Preisinger said,

    July 21, 2010 @ 10:46 pm

    You might also want to put the ELCA’s “Peace Not Walls” as a link on your sidebar.


    July 23, 2010 @ 6:31 am

    […] Assembly, the gloves had come off – in addition to the Christian Century article I described in Part 1 of this posting, the Middle East Study Committee report and other overtures had been subject to a barrage of […]

  28. Gregory Rienzo said,

    July 27, 2010 @ 12:38 am

    Thank you Mark for your helpful, clarifying statement…It continues the comments that you made at the Sabeel Coference in San Anselmo, California this past Spring.

  29. BRAVERMAN: Report from the Presbyterian General Assembly – Part 1 12July10 said,

    August 12, 2010 @ 5:39 pm

    […] by Mark Braverman –  12 July 2010 […]

  30. William Gepford said,

    November 11, 2010 @ 9:45 pm

    One thing I have learned through my years in the ministry and in mission work in other countries, is that those who shout the loudest are the most suspect. The truth is its own defense. Told firmly and quietly to those in power, it is transformative. Those most in denial regarding truth, are the first to try and smash its redemptive power. Thank you again Mark for your firm, powerful and loving approach. I am convinced that your way will win the day. You have taught us not to be afraid to tell the truth!

  31. Abdul Wahid Pulao said,

    December 29, 2010 @ 1:04 am

    Dear Mark:
    I saw you on the video about your book Fatal Embrace. In the video what you have menttioned so truthfully and bravely has made me go back to the verses in the Holy Quran in which those jews and Christians who are truth ful and believe in God and the day of judgement and want peace in this World, will be rewarde their due rewards in the hereafter. You are certainly one such brave man of true Judaist faith whome Islam has always upheld and so has our prophet Muhammad. Please continue your brave efforts to speak the truth and to bring peace between Muslims, Christians and Jews. I f people like you are in the World then Peace is not hard to reach.

    Thank you again.

    Abdul Wahid

RSS feed for comments on this post